Discover your unique microbiome profile with advanced testing

Learn More →
Bacterium

Lactobacillus rhamnosus

Common name: L. rhamnosus

Beneficial Digestive Gut Oral Urogenital
Beneficial
Effect
Digestive
Impact
Gut, Oral, Urogenital
Location
Common
Prevalence

Lactobacillus rhamnosus

Overview

Lactobacillus rhamnosus (recently reclassified as Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus) is a Gram-positive, non-spore-forming, facultatively anaerobic rod-shaped bacterium that has become the most extensively studied probiotic species worldwide. The strain L. rhamnosus GG (LGG, ATCC 53103), isolated from healthy human feces by Sherwood Gorbach and Barry Goldwin, has been the subject of hundreds of clinical trials spanning gastrointestinal health, immune modulation, allergy prevention, and beyond.

Key Characteristics

L. rhamnosus is known for its remarkable environmental resilience, surviving the harsh conditions of the gastrointestinal tract including low pH and bile salts. This resilience is partly due to its ability to form biofilms and produce galactose-rich exopolysaccharides that protect from environmental stressors.

Several strains show tissue-specific tropism:

  • LGG: Intestinal specialist with SpaCBA pili for strong mucosal adhesion
  • GR-1: Vaginal niche adaptation with superior oxidative stress resistance
  • HN001: Superior eczema prevention with long-lasting effects

SpaCBA Pili: The Key to Intestinal Adhesion

LGG's unique intestinal colonization ability stems from its SpaCBA pili—heterotrimeric surface appendages that mediate adhesion to intestinal mucosa.

Pilus Structure and Function

  • SpaB: Primary mucus-binding subunit with 7-fold greater binding than other pilus proteins; uses electrostatic contacts (pI 8.0)
  • SpaC: Contains von Willebrand factor-like domain for lectin-type binding; directly binds immature human intestinal epithelial cells
  • Antiserum effect: SpaA antiserum reduces whole-cell mucus binding 5-fold

Immunomodulatory Role

Pilus knockout mutants show drastically reduced adhesion and abolish biofilm formation. Importantly, pilus-deficient strains induce ~2-fold higher IL-8 production, demonstrating that pili dampen inflammatory responses while maintaining adhesion.

Immune System Modulation

IgA Production via p40-EGFR-APRIL Pathway

LGG secretes a protein called p40 that activates a sophisticated immune signaling cascade:

  1. p40 binding: Activates EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) on intestinal epithelial cells
  2. Akt phosphorylation: Leads to NF-κB p65 nuclear translocation
  3. APRIL release: Epithelial cells secrete APRIL (a proliferation-inducing ligand)
  4. IgA class switching: APRIL promotes IgA+ B cell differentiation in lamina propria

Administration of 10 μg p40 daily for 3 weeks significantly elevated fecal IgA at 2 and 3 weeks (p<0.05). Effects were abolished in intestinal epithelium-specific EGFR-knockout mice.

Dendritic Cell Activation and T Cell Regulation

LGG-derived soluble mediators modulate dendritic cell functionality:

  • Significantly higher CD86 expression after TNF-α stimulation (p<0.05)
  • Enhanced Foxp3+ CD25+ regulatory T cells
  • Increased IFN-γ and IL-2 production in CD4+ CD25+ T cells

Th1/Th2 Balance

LGG promotes Th1 responses while modulating inflammation:

  • Significantly increases IL-12 and TNF-α in macrophages (p<0.05)
  • Increases anti-inflammatory IL-10
  • Decreases Th2-associated cytokines (IL-4, IL-5)
  • Down-regulates TLR2 on DCs, macrophages, and monocytes

Gut Barrier Function

Tight Junction Enhancement

L. rhamnosus strains significantly enhance intestinal barrier integrity:

Study Model Key Findings
OLL2838 strain DSS colitis mice ZO-1 increased 4.8-fold; FITC-dextran permeability significantly decreased
CY12 strain LPS-challenged Caco-2 Upregulated occludin, ZO-1, claudin (p<0.05); inhibited TLR4/NF-κB pathway

Mucus Production

LGG's p40 protein activates EGFR → Akt → Muc2 gene expression pathway:

  • MUC2 mRNA increased 2.5-3.5 fold at 50 ng/mL p40
  • Thickened colonic mucus layer in wild-type mice
  • Increased MUC2-positive goblet cells per crypt (p<0.05)
  • Effects abolished with EGFR or Akt inhibition

Competitive Exclusion of Pathogens

LGG produces lectin-like molecules (Llp1, Llp2) that specifically disrupt pathogen biofilms:

  • Salmonella typhimurium: 90% biofilm reduction at 200 μg/mL Llp2
  • E. coli UTI89: 88-90% reduction at 50 μg/mL
  • Beneficial effect: ~2-fold increased biofilm of other Lactobacillus strains

Clinical Evidence: Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea

LGG demonstrates strong evidence for AAD prevention. A systematic review of 12 RCTs (n=1499) showed:

Outcome LGG Placebo Relative Risk 95% CI
Overall AAD 12.3% 22.4% 0.49 0.29-0.83
Children - - 0.48 0.26-0.89
H. pylori eradication AAD - - 0.26 0.11-0.59

Number needed to treat: 7 to prevent one case of AAD.

Clinical Evidence: Acute Gastroenteritis

Contrasting Results

A landmark NEJM trial (n=971 children) showed no benefit of LGG for acute gastroenteritis in North American emergency departments:

  • Moderate-to-severe gastroenteritis: LGG 11.8% vs placebo 12.6% (RR 0.96, p=0.83)
  • Median diarrhea duration: 49.7 vs 50.9 hours (p=0.26)

However, meta-analysis of 18 trials (n=4,208) found:

  • Diarrhea duration reduction: -0.85 days (CI -1.15 to -0.56)
  • More effective at doses ≥10¹⁰ CFU daily
  • Greater efficacy in European vs non-European settings

Rotavirus Mechanism

LGG inhibits rotavirus-induced chloride secretion and oxidative stress. Both live bacteria and conditioned medium (postbiotic):

  • Significantly reduced short-circuit current
  • Maintained TEER (transepithelial electrical resistance)
  • Reduced ROS and maintained GSH/GSSG ratio
  • Inhibited caspase-3-mediated apoptosis and NF-κB p65 translocation

Clinical Evidence: Allergy and Eczema Prevention

Landmark Finnish Study

A double-blind RCT (n=132) provided breakthrough evidence for prenatal/postnatal LGG in allergy prevention:

Outcome LGG Group Placebo Group p-value
Atopic eczema 23% (15/64) 46% (31/68) 0.008
Relative risk 0.51 - -
NNT 4.5 - -

Intervention: LGG administered 2-4 weeks before delivery + 6 months postnatally.

Strain Comparison: HN001 vs LGG

A comparative trial (n=474) showed L. rhamnosus HN001 achieved superior outcomes:

  • Eczema prevention: HR 0.51 (95% CI 0.30-0.85, p=0.01)
  • Skin prick test sensitization: HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.48-0.99)
  • Effects persisted to age 6 years
  • Mechanism: Increased cord blood IFN-γ, breast milk TGF-β and IgA

Clinical Evidence: Respiratory Infections

LGG significantly reduces respiratory infections in children attending daycare:

Outcome Relative Risk 95% CI NNT
URTI 0.66 0.52-0.82 5
Respiratory infections ≥3 days 0.57 0.41-0.78 5
Symptom duration Significantly lower - -

Study: 281 children, 10⁹ CFU LGG daily for 3 months (p<0.001 for duration).

Gut-Brain Axis Effects

Anxiety and Mood

Early-life LGG colonization in mice reduces anxiety-like behavior in adulthood through:

  • EGFR activation → increased SERT expression
  • Increased BDNF and GABA receptors in hippocampus/amygdala
  • Enhanced gut barrier (ZO-1, villus length, crypt depth)
  • Modulated intestinal serotonergic system

Cognitive Function

In a human trial (n=145), LGG supplementation improved cognition in impaired adults:

  • Total Cognition Score: 38.7→47.6 (RCI=2.07) vs placebo 37.7→42.4 (p=0.03)
  • Effect size: ηp²=0.03
  • Mechanisms: Reduced IL-8, enhanced CREB/BDNF, improved glucose/insulin sensitivity

Colonization and Persistence

LGG colonization studies (n=21) reveal important kinetics:

Time Point Biopsy Recovery Fecal Recovery
Immediately post-dosing 100% 100%
1 week post 88% 25%
2 weeks post 29% 0%

Biopsy counts ranged from 6×10¹ to 4×10⁴ CFU/biopsy (mean 6×10³). Notably, LGG persists on colonic mucosa even after becoming undetectable in feces, indicating that fecal analysis underestimates true colonization.

Strain Comparison: LGG vs GR-1

Comparative genomic analysis reveals niche-specific adaptations:

Feature LGG GR-1
Primary niche Intestinal Vaginal
SpaCBA pili Present Absent
Gastric acid survival Superior Moderate
Oxidative stress resistance Moderate Superior (0.1% H₂O₂)
Lactose metabolism No Yes
Fucose metabolism Yes No
Inflammatory induction TNF, IL-8, IL-6 in vaginal cells No TNF/IL-8 induction
Unique orthogroups 270 48

GR-1 is specifically adapted for urogenital health applications, typically used with RC-14 for vaginal health.

Safety Profile

General Safety

LGG has Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) status and is well-tolerated in healthy populations. Dropout rates are comparable between probiotic (6%) and placebo (13%) groups across trials.

Bacteremia Risk

A comprehensive review of 75 bacteremia cases reveals important safety considerations:

Risk Factor Prevalence/Incidence
Hospitalized patients 0.1-0.2% of blood isolates
Immunocompromised 0.5% of blood isolates
Pediatric ICU receiving LGG 1.1% vs 0.009% not receiving
Overall mortality 30%
1-year mortality 48%

High-risk populations (caution/contraindicated):

  • Critically ill ICU patients
  • Severely immunocompromised individuals
  • Patients with central venous catheters
  • Post-surgical patients with intestinal barrier disruption
  • Hematopoietic cell transplant recipients

Antibiotic Susceptibility

Antibiotic Susceptibility
Erythromycin 94.3% susceptible
Clindamycin 90.0% susceptible
Penicillin 63.6% susceptible
Vancomycin 22.5% susceptible (intrinsic resistance)

Recommended Dosing

Indication Dose Duration
AAD prevention ≥10¹⁰ CFU daily During antibiotic course
Acute gastroenteritis 10¹⁰ CFU twice daily 5 days
Respiratory infection prevention 10⁹ CFU daily 3 months
Eczema prevention 6×10⁹ CFU daily Prenatal + 2 years postnatal
Mucosal colonization ~6×10¹⁰ CFU/day 12 days minimum

Summary of Clinical Efficacy

Strong Evidence

  • Antibiotic-associated diarrhea prevention (63% risk reduction, NNT=7)
  • Eczema prevention with prenatal/early-life supplementation (49-51% risk reduction)
  • Upper respiratory tract infection reduction in children (34% risk reduction, NNT=5)
  • Healthcare-associated diarrhea prevention in hospitalized children

Moderate Evidence

  • Traveler's diarrhea prevention (up to 39.5% protection at specific locations)
  • Cognitive improvement in cognitively impaired older adults
  • Metabolic health improvements in obesity
  • Gut-brain axis effects on anxiety and mood

Negative or Inconsistent Evidence

  • Acute gastroenteritis treatment in North American children (NEJM 2018)
  • General atopy prevention (inconsistent across studies)
  • URTI frequency reduction (may affect severity, not frequency)

Associated Conditions

Research References

  1. Szajewska H, Kolodziej M. Systematic review with meta-analysis: Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea in children and adults. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2015. doi:10.1111/apt.13404
  2. Schnadower D, Tarr PI, Casper TC, Gorelick MH, Dean JM, O'Connell KJ, et al.. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG versus Placebo for Acute Gastroenteritis in Children. New England Journal of Medicine. 2018. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1802598
  3. Kalliomäki M, Salminen S, Arvilommi H, Lehtinen P, Isolauri E. Probiotics in primary prevention of atopic disease: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2001. doi:10.1067/mai.2001.114308
  4. Lebeer S, Claes I, Tytgat HLP, et al.. Functional Analysis of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG Pili in Relation to Adhesion and Immunomodulatory Interactions with Intestinal Epithelial Cells. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2012. doi:10.1128/AEM.06192-11
  5. Wang Y, Liu L, Moore DJ, et al.. An LGG-derived protein promotes IgA production through upregulation of APRIL expression in intestinal epithelial cells. Mucosal Immunology. 2017. doi:10.1038/mi.2016.57
  6. Hojsak I, Snovak N, Abdović S, et al.. Lactobacillus GG in the prevention of gastrointestinal and respiratory tract infections in children who attend day care centers. Clinical Nutrition. 2010. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2009.09.008
  7. Kullar R, Goldstein EJC, Johnson S, McFarland LV. Lactobacillus Bacteremia and Probiotics: A Review. Microorganisms. 2023. doi:10.3390/microorganisms11040896
  8. Petrova MI, Macklaim JM, Wuyts S, et al.. Comparative Genomic and Phenotypic Analysis of the Vaginal Probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2018. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.01278
  9. Wickens K, Black PN, Stanley TV, et al.. A differential effect of 2 probiotics in the prevention of eczema and atopy: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2008. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2008.07.011
  10. Alander M, Satokari R, Korpela R, et al.. Persistence of colonization of human colonic mucosa by a probiotic strain, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, after oral consumption. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1999. doi:10.1128/aem.65.1.351-354.1999